Global Warming = Global B.S.
"Global Warming" is not happening. The current media blitz around it is utter crap'ola. Man IS NOT causing climate change on a global level. Global climate change is a completely natural process. Our planets climate has never been static so there is no reason to expect it to be now. Six hundred years ago, people in London used to ice skate on the Themes - but they don't now. That change was natural.
There is remarkably little information regarding the debate on this topic. Many have already declared that the debate is over. It's not. Since when has scientific debate been looked down upon? If a scientist were to come out today (as some have) and question "Global Warming" they are driven out of town. What do the supporters of this "Global Warming" theory have to fear from debate, so much so that they not only refuse to debate it, but call anyone who doesn't agree with them to be suffering from some kind of ID10T error. Fortunately, there is one site that has good coverage of the other side of this theory. Watch it here: www.sacredscoop.com
"An Inconvenient Truth" conveniently skips the actual scientific evidence, but in one scene the huge hole in their "evidence" is shown and they just steer your eyes away from it. In the scene where wanker-man is standing in front of a graph which shows a time line comparing both temperature and CO2, where he states that the proof is undeniable, I urge you to take a closer look at the graph. It clearly shows that when CO2 goes up, temperature goes up - which is the linchpin to the "evidence". However, were you to have any intelligence whatsoever, you would notice that, while what he states is true, the graph clearly shows a lag of almost 400 years between the temperature and CO2. The real problem is, and one that they don't like to talk about - and he skips completely over, is that the temperature climbs BEFORE the carbon levels do. Yes. According to Al - and all his "yes men" supporters, cause FOLLOWS effect.
Absolute BS. I implore you to prove me wrong.
There is remarkably little information regarding the debate on this topic. Many have already declared that the debate is over. It's not. Since when has scientific debate been looked down upon? If a scientist were to come out today (as some have) and question "Global Warming" they are driven out of town. What do the supporters of this "Global Warming" theory have to fear from debate, so much so that they not only refuse to debate it, but call anyone who doesn't agree with them to be suffering from some kind of ID10T error. Fortunately, there is one site that has good coverage of the other side of this theory. Watch it here: www.sacredscoop.com
"An Inconvenient Truth" conveniently skips the actual scientific evidence, but in one scene the huge hole in their "evidence" is shown and they just steer your eyes away from it. In the scene where wanker-man is standing in front of a graph which shows a time line comparing both temperature and CO2, where he states that the proof is undeniable, I urge you to take a closer look at the graph. It clearly shows that when CO2 goes up, temperature goes up - which is the linchpin to the "evidence". However, were you to have any intelligence whatsoever, you would notice that, while what he states is true, the graph clearly shows a lag of almost 400 years between the temperature and CO2. The real problem is, and one that they don't like to talk about - and he skips completely over, is that the temperature climbs BEFORE the carbon levels do. Yes. According to Al - and all his "yes men" supporters, cause FOLLOWS effect.
Absolute BS. I implore you to prove me wrong.



0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home